NO
PLOS One- once reasonable but never again
Scientific Reports- editorial office incompetence
Royal Society Open Science- contradictory and opaque decision making
Quantitative Science Studies- once an excellent journal but seems to have drifted into insular directions
Heliyon- simply no
Research Square- a bureaucratic preprint server
JASSS- plaintive and pedantic in the face of perceived inconformity.
YES
MetaRoR- our single experience has been outstanding. Critical but fair reviews
Complex Networks and their Applications (CNA)- open to submissions from different subfields
PLOS Complex Networks- has some very good papers
Applied Network Science- can be very good but it all depends on the assigned editor
Scientometrics- a storied journal. No complaints so far.
Social Network Analysis and Mining- promising from what I've seen
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications- promising
Zenodo- my preprint server of choice because of ease of submission and ability to link to Github repos
arXiv- no complaints but appears to be getting overwhelmed
BioRxiv- not bad
Under Exploration
CSSSA conference- stay tuned for feedback
